Whether Strickland requires counsel to procure an adequate defense expert to negate or mitigate the intent element of the crime when that was the only defense available at trial, in violation of the Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION 1: Whether Strickland requires counsel to procure an adequate defense expert to negate or mitigate the intent element of the crime when that was the only defense available at trial, in violation of the Sixth And Fourteenth Amendment. QUESTION 2: Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights to Due Process require the court to grant funds for a defense expert to Assist In Preparing and Presenting His Defense, other than as provided in Ake v. Oklahoma, to negate or mitigate the intent element of the crime when that was the only defense available at trial, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. / QUESTION 3: Whether Verrett was Denied His Sixth Amendment Right To Due Process and A Fair and Impartial Jury Trial When, After Learning of The Victim's Family Contacts Throughout the Parish as Well as Wide Publicity of The Case, He Was Denied A Change of Venue, in Violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. 1