Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court should provide a list of the cases they claim to be frivolous or malicious, and afford the petitioner an opportunity to cure any alleged deficiency they claim?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The GiKiahema Supreme Courk's october 260 Zo2zd | ORDER denying lis Petition For writ ef habeas Corpus is baseol Upon the bare allegation that Petitioner has had three or mere cases efismissecl for Frivelous omaltcrous, Sheuld the Oklahoma Supreme Court prewide a list of the aases they claim to be Frivelous or maltejens% And shouted they afford Petitioner oppertunity te cure bh atevealeFicrency they tlaim? a. Bs the state of Oklahoma authorized to poescente ane incaccecate Petitioner Fer « nen-existant erime for which Petitronewas not pert on notice to defend against? 3. Does the fact thet OKlahema refuses to reconcile, ; er at feast rule on the merits, two sUriserectiona! . Gontradetions, ar ‘deficiencies render Petiticner's Gonurction and sewtence uncon stikutienal ?