Whether the Decision below squarely conflicts with McCarthy v. United States and Neder v. United States, where Mr. Cross Held a Constitutional Right to know Both the Nature and Cause of the Charges Against him, which Included Both the Materiality of the charge and Intent for any Plea to be valid under a Rule 11 Plea?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L. Whether the Decision below squarely conflicts with McCarthy y. United States and Neder v. United States, where Mr. Cross Held a Constitutional Right to know Both the Nature and Cause of the Charges Against him, which Included Both the Materiality of the charge and Intent for any Plea to be valid under a Rule 11 Plea? I~ Whether the Decision Below squarely conflicts with Neder y. United States where a plea of guilt relating to a defect in the Indictment, affects jurisdiction of the Court, and Where the Indictment Fails to Charge an Offense, does the Guilty. Plea Waive the defects? I. Whether The Decision of the District Court that it holds jurisdiction over a Claim of Bank Fraud, where the Bank nor victims are covered by FDIC Insurance for any loss from Bank Fraud, conflicts with United States v. Perez-Ceballos, intel alia, where the charge should be a State claim, not Federal? Certiorari-Cross i .