Whether the trial court violated Melendez's Sixth Amendment right under the United States and Delaware Constitution when it denied his verbal request to proceed pro se

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED [. Did trial Court Violate Melendez's sixth Amendmen + wight undew the united sdrtes and Delaware Caonsthfuipion when it’ denied hts Yerdal request? +o proceed Pro se? : 2. Did trial Court Violate Melender's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process, When it forced him iatod tna] with vnwanted Crunsel ? 3. Did trial Court zagage in proper aad Ehorou h Celloguy with Melendez after Waving vight fo Caunse? ? — 'F. Did trial Court properly address Melendex's Complaint of a Conflict with big) Counse?) 7? 5, \Wias the Delware Superror and Supreme Cour Fs denial of Melendez’s request +s represent himse)f odvevse fo the sprrvd of the StXt+h Amendment and a proper applicatren of Delaware Law ? 6. Did the United States District Court evr A demying Melendez's wrt 4ased Solely on tardiness, Failing Po raviews the ineffecHve assistance of tral Crunse/ and SXth Amendment Velbon When Same issues raised Severe Fadewal questons Sufficient for lateness +o he Waived P 7. Did the united states District Court evr ja denying MeleRde2’s brit When Same infact did establish Valid Elaims of Coashtibronal Violations that Jonsts of reason World find debatadfe ? ik