Does the N.C. Supreme Court decision conflict with Plye# v. Doe, Ex-Parte Bain v. U.S., U.S. v. Gaudin and the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution by allowing the State to indict the Petitioner for a felony charge, then change the nature of the offense charge during trial without resubmission to the grand jury, resulting in the Petitioner being convicted of a charge that is not the law of the land?

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Since the N.C. Constitution guarantees indictment by a grand jury for felony charges, does the N.C. Supreme Court decision conflict with Plye# v. Doe, Ex-Parte Bain v. U.S., U.S. v. Gaudin and the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution by allowing the State to indict the Petitioner for a felony charge, then change the nature of the offense charge during trial without resubmission to the grand jury, resulting in the Petitioner being convicted of a charge that is not the law of the land? PAGEI