No. 20-7066

William Echols v. Douglas Fender, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: allied-offenses case-joinder confrontation-clause constitutional-rights due-process evidence-sufficiency fair-trial joinder trial-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-03-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Echols was denied a fair and impartial trial due to several major constitutional and due process violations that included an improper joiner of cases totally independent of each other?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION(S) I. WHETHER ECHOLS WAS DENIED A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL DUE TO SEVERAL MAJOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS THAT INCLUDED AN IMPROPER JOINER OF CASES TOTALLY INDEPENDENT OF EACH OTHER? II. WHETHER THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO CONVICT ECHOLS OF THE CRIMES FOR WHICH HE WAS CONVICTED OF HEREIN? III. WHETHER ECHOLS WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT ; TO CONFRONT JIS ACCUSER AT TRIAL? IV. WHETHER ECHOLS WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED FOR ALLIED OFFENSES DENYING ECHOLS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AND DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL? ~ii

Docket Entries

2021-03-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent Douglas Fender to respond filed.
2021-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Douglas Fender
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
William Echols
William Echols — Petitioner
William Echols — Petitioner