Whether federal courts should gain jurisdiction when a state supreme court refuses to recognize 28 U.S.C. 1446(d)

No question identified. : The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1971 stated: “In the event of conflicting proceedings during the interim, federal jurisdiction prevails over state jurisdiction and many courts have held the actions to the state court to be a coram non judice and absolutely void.” Yet, the United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri claimed it did not have jurisdiction in this case and remanded the removal case and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals also dismissed Petitioner’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Should the federal courts gain jurisdiction when the state Supreme Court refuses to recognize 28 U.S.C. 1446 (d)? . Petitioner believes her constitutional rights have been violated when she has presented five applications to transfer her causes from the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District to the Supreme Court of Missouri. Each time the Supreme Court of Missouri issued a denial and mandate simultaneously. Not being able to file a reconsideration, has the Supreme Court of Missouri deprived Petitioner who is within its jurisdiction, equal protection of the laws pursuant ’ to the Fourteenth Amendment? :