J. P. Parnell v. Doctor Chen, et al.
SocialSecurity Immigration
At what point does the judiciary have an obligation to curtail efforts to procedurally bar inmate litigation and consider gross salient factors that are persuasive even considering PLRA and/or AEDPA?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED At what point 44 the judiciary obliged to curtail efforts to procedunakly bar inmate Litigation and consider gross salient factors that ane persuasive even considering PLRA and/onx AEDPA? Hexe, dated 3 December 2015, at-ban plaintiff appealed to the Calif. onnia State Auditor for help in uncovering the guile alleged in Parnell v . Chen, Case No. 19-16163, of the concerted coercing to cause indigent inmate to sign-fon and accept expensive orthopaedic footwear with no genuine medicak need. , ; : Even following at-bar Litigation prompting CDCR to revamp its inmate co-pay system with the adoption of "Notice of Change to Health Care Regula. tions," (attached hereto at