Jimmy Lloyd Alexander v. California
Securities
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, judicial bias, and improper admission of evidence
No question identified. : | 9 : . Cuserioubditereunen _‘Tupub olla. | WITHOUT AMY WEAPOVS, How DID PET TIOWEe. CaneUT Ar Chime | ale The LunGes BUUMGS 1M COW ELUCT WIth SETTLED LAW —_ , WAT RE buile His CouRT Te $2 T-ASE PETLLIMMEES oS aailetion © Arty IQOES THE PETITIONER DESERWE At His mir sft. MEARYLG AAO A PUBUCAPOLOEY ERM THE PAST: 4 LIAS REQWKED HOR THE OVE STRIKE KIDWAPEMG ALLEGATIOAS) / Ss THE CECI SU FEIC( EMT EMOUG 10 PRWE. THAT JAVME DO. ‘s MLE MEAL | SUBTAWTIALLY. LLL. REBSED. . lu. (ER THE STATE Adli> FERER AL CONSTITUTIONS | BECAUSE | TV SERVES WO L1(GAT (mae. PEW OLOGICAL GreAt.,/§ | 78 WEARS TO LIFE. CRVEL An/I>? UNUSUAL PUNISH rc ? Oi MAL Suite. ABUSE 1S Powe BY AbiDwills Tie 2 WieTiMs TésTiauy TO GO UN COKRETER, Aalt>s oT SHE _LLER OW THE DEFEVPOANT BECAUE SHE WAS OWL LROVE THAT. SHE DID 1M FACT LIE BBECAUSE. Se D0 AT WANT T0 BE_ARLESTTED. FOR MAM A PASE I c VES THE PEDPLE BE WAT. 1 OR DE. a ueT 12 Fv JAE DOE (ALEC ITI) WOT” : REDIBLE JT Weve HAVE TO REJECT THE IRREL~ EVAVT EXPERT TEST Iatonly OF OR ado MECHAMC? _ — _6) DID THe That Cover Covducl A HEAR MG Ta sOEVTIEL All, EVALUATE WHETHER AW -EXTPAVE OS (VFL EVE D RESIS LTE | i _Jueoe eins f | 2 LF THE OF FEW DAT ESTABLISHES PREJYDILE AS A RESY LT OF _&§) Dio fb atiary, E1THe. BECIRE OR DUM THE TRIAL, PRESVOIE. | A2ROES AW VIOLATE THE DEFEMDANTS RIGHT TO Ad [PARTIAL Sve 7 | YD WAS Jy pss POTEVTIMLY EXQOSEO TO PRES) DIAL pvauieeTe q _ THAT THE CovkT SHOVLEVE mabe AA lv QUIRY TO DETER rales THE. EISTEME OF ACTUAL Ex pasiiete © | | LO) SHoULD THE JUDGE HAVE. SEQUESTERED THE JURY Als PRIVY: een CAUTIR MALY AMSTRUCTIOWS TO SAFE GUARIN AGA AST PRESLACE 2 i i WW) O10 THE TRIAL Ji ble HAVE A PERSIE BIAS OR. PREI OCE THAT , 1) GET Aresoeen Hoi Dil THE TRIAL Wu0bE Hate. PERSO At . KilovtlehGt 0” DISPVTED Eu. DeEnTIARY FACTS, AMD WAS ITO BECAUSE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS BROTHER 18 A LAWYER Mimsele| _13) DID Tite PéoiecuTOR “PLOEUTE wWiTHt EARALESTHESS. aw, LIGD2!, O 1él HE | USE ImekoPER METHODS CALCULATED TO PRODUCE A wWROMGrFUL ConleTIoWd ? Fihat £46 DEB. DE FEaALDAVTS RIGHTS BY ALLOU) A/G THEATESTIMOMY TOGO VU CORRECTED OR AYO VOT BEEK LUDEI>e __kf ly war THe_DvA EWbedte EXCLUDED, AUD Titt. Abt.bulé by, EVE AFTER TL COVRTS LEAMCVED | WAT THE Od -SfELM DSA UAS COMTAMUMATED Duele THe Exanl Aad The 2k awe LOU | 6 ERA ONEEEREAT VUE COMTRIBUTERS TIFT Le [FE _T1 ~ COURTS WlOULI> HAVE EK CLUE THE VICTIMS = TESTIMONY 4ETEL SME AOHUTIED TO bLVlil To LA: Z DUO THE SAY HAVE | G, VERIICT AORE. FAUORA bli TO THE DEF EAM ATE (F OES -A OF THE FRO FEEREO EVIDEMCE OR TESTIMOWMY , ACTUALLY PROVE THAT Thé OELEM DAA WAS Lal FACT ___ OT” CrULTY OF THE. ALLUSE CAMES © 12, lo DTA RTS S140 1k FLAVOR TOW AR Titi ILE GE _ WTI BECAUSE THE Alle CIB VICTIAIS BROTHER $A LAUER. AMD Adal ASSOCIATE THAT WORMS Lal THE 5 AALE PRACTICA AMI 1A The SBE. COLMTY AS THE . UOC, THE PRISE CUTIR, AVD THE PUBLIC DEC FEDER , | RIEO THE DE FEAAMTS (ASE C ig | ¢ TRIAL COURTS KWaed BR=THAT IT WAS COmLiCTIde : —S _ CHE. PETITNMER. Bal THE BASIS OF EVIDEALE SEIZES WITHOUT __A_WARRAWT OW THE BASIS OBTHE “WELL TABLE DISCOVERY, __ DOCTRINE, OF SITE. THE LACK OF AMO Gods |AVESTIGATION ©: 20) 18 iT IMpROpE CONDUTT Aaly PROB ELUTORIAL A111 DAL DUCE WHA! | LA THIS CASE THE TRIAL Ju nGe ALLOWED TINE PROS cuOh. TO EXPRESS PERS IW AL O° tanlS ABDUT DE LEAOANTS Gut An CREOURITY AND AAD E POTE ALTIALLY Us) FAlle AL WO LRWPER REMARKS ABOUT | THE DEFEMWAUT, THE bébé as Coulstl, Ad) THE DELERSE WHITES | __Duvtiae Thal © 21) DID THe PbO 562 VOR Conall PRIELUTR lat (MS Dal DUCT BY __ at pRE spall OL MOVES ARDIAZM ATTEES. RE baie PERSO Altri L _ENPEREMCE A EXPERTARVOWLEDOE F . 22) WAS Tite PROSECUTOR Ld VIOLATION! FOR ConmmenTivé os! TH | __DEFEWDAVTS PREVIOUS Con ViCTIOWS © fl 33) ARE THE TRIAL. CoWRTS LA WOLBTIOW Qt FOR IDL ATG __ Reset PETITIOWNEES DUE PROCES RIGHTS BY ALLoU > THE PROSECUTOR. TR _VOULIE Oe THE CREM BILITY OF THE : GOR LEAT VT ALES. USA REE LEVANT: EM PERIK TEST | LL OAE | vF, Aue Ativan TO MS Ou PERSIA AL. ATEGRI we