Did the Third Circuit err in holding that "Federal Bank Robbery is a Crime of Violence under the Element Clause of 18 U-S.C. §924(c )(3)( A) of this Court's holding in United States v. Johnson/ 899 F.3d 191/ 203-04 (3rd Cir.)/ Cert, denied 139 S. Ct. 647 (2018); United States v. Wilson/ 880 F.3d 80/ 88 (3rd Cir.)/ Cert, denied 138 S. Ct. 2586/ in light of this Court's holding in Carter v. United States/ 530 U.S.!255, 268 (2000), that the offense is a general intent rather than a specific intent crime, and given decades of Circuit precedent holding htat intimidation i underthe statute is judged by the reasonable reaction of the listener rather than by the defendant's intent?

Is Bank Robbery under 18 U-S.C- §2113(a) a divisible statute under the Element Clause of 18 U-S.C. §924(c) according to United States v. Butler, No. 19-10065, F. 3d (5th Cir. 2020)?

Did the Third Circuit err in holding that Federal Bank Robbery is a Crime of Violence under the Element Clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(A)