No. 20-7084

Mindy Hill v. Google LLC, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights closed-captioning digital-content due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech standing terms-of-service youtube-terms-of-service
Key Terms:
Copyright
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court should resolve the issues regarding Google's YouTube terms of service, safety concerns, and violation of Ms. Hill's first amendment rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the court should resolve the following for which the state courts are dominated by Google’s financial endeavors, and further use . of TikTok TERMS OF SERVICE; if Google’s YouTube TERMS OF SERVICE poses safety concerns and violated Ms. Hill’s first amendment rights to freedom of the press and abridging freedom of speech by Google’s YouTube sharing-streaming service generated automatic closed captioning “glitch” appeared on MGM video uploaded , to YouTube sharing-streaming service on December 8, 2016, when Ms. | Hill stated “What's up DC this is your girl Mindy Jo with the DC Voice dot com,” and YouTube’s automated closed captioning “glitch” ‘translated that communication into “What’s up DC bitch girl maybe gel ' with?” 2. Whether Civil Rules of Civil Procedure are modified, exclusionary or certain rights are reserved based on names in filing of complaint. If : not, were Ms. Hill’s fourteenth amendment rights to the United States Constitution violated bypassing the Trial phase of Civil Procedure . . resulting in Judge Anthony Epstein’s JUDGEMENT for Google LLC et . al when plaintiff's complaint filed CASE CAPTION is Google Inc. et al, when all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State ; wherein they reside. 3. Whether Google’s YouTube automated closed captioning “glitch” violated Ms. Hill’s fifth amendment rights to the United States Constitution granting no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or . ‘property in-her pursuit to life, liberty as an journalist while working on December 8, 2016 covering the MGM National Harbor Grand Opening, later uploading the original digital content to the YouTube video | sharing-streaming service resulting in the closed caption automatically generating a “glitch,” and no ability to monetize on original digital content uploaded to Google’s YouTube video sharing-streaming service.

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent Google LLC & YouTube, LLC to respond filed.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2021)

Attorneys

Google LLC & YouTube, LLC
Courtney MillerHarris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, Respondent
Courtney MillerHarris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, Respondent
Mindy Hill
Mindy Hill — Petitioner
Mindy Hill — Petitioner