Does Section 1382 codify the common law of trespass, such that Petitioner could be convicted for unlawfully entering a military installation when he crossed the green line, even though his initial entry onto Vandenberg for protest purposes was, in fact, authorized?

Question Presented In United States v. Apel, 571 U.S. 359, 373 (2014), this Court held that the term “military installation” in 18 U.S.C. § 1382 includes all areas under the commanding officer’s area of responsibility. Thus, as applied to Vandenberg Air Force Base, the boundary of the military installation is not defined by a green line demarcating public and exclusive jurisdiction. This case presents a sequel to Apel. Does Section 1382 codify the common law of trespass, such that Petitioner could be convicted for unlawfully entering a military installation when he crossed the green line, even though his initial entry onto Vandenberg for protest purposes was, in fact, authorized? i Statement of