Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment

No question identified. : . c. Fy 450 PL way Sp bar bq (PP) PAP? BYR OP vEABOM 9 Se /2 Succ OSiajap oF YL@t AY (P2 GPRM cy fesMoeo 2 Sayop hg yy CL pus te24 WD we apo ve BOSS| op 2 bye 2 Poo OPIS PRY P7sip ~ se DyBs By Sp 2. Sounpazes J yoke) We mayo OI May [27¥ [0777 2f M0 SL GF FiMSL By Psawrmq WerPaeyl SFUeW \Mogapigsncy Se Srmryo FO SSajyas 2°} Spyoe ayy SA SS2DI? ejwm™) Mig huey OL Ay yp Sot PI os DP ANADS NCWIAP bueno aqmo J? OM prey QA@D 7 Zoow ap ave ui obxgsod yoBay Wm ry alos CH (PVPS ADVPS wroswod esoveaq #13))-+ Ioowepsan ZR 20D SVD) SLs [CPD PR? Se Ssaayes asasd {Ph epanmny wre ovap PP PYRI PL ST Ga.LNaS3ud (S)NOLLSANo