No. 20-7097

Alree B. Sweat, III v. City of Las Cruces, New Mexico, et al.

Lower Court: New Mexico
Docketed: 2021-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-law fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress post-conviction-relief property-rights search-and-seizure takings
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the New Mexico Supreme Court erred in denying petitioner's motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : BISETEO PRESENTED : | AAMineWnar Awe, bisky scl cous Ves avedans Bowmen Wu deere tt. propacky Aecided Awe Lniedice of C\ne wo) ASS! Wino due Genke | AwS Nn Lk me Anouk Avyiwe Me. Wemveserce(D) e Woew owes | 35 Sve Qik Fw Ore Twe 6 Geen tery ude cemne nk =A. O50 Petey. | cocsnaned sce © senate af Se € Navi kebsouss (B) siwekwer Av | Deyn atk 3x2 ccaekinne Sommnaus deme me im eropertey waked, . lL. re “bccn omcre my uike> Slooles Disk couwk « ata oe oo we sane phe Ormsecss Sows Nee diwe Grom owe wrest. : |. proparny sve ou snot Wd Wome oF LAS On psisies c\etw CS Tos ex wer We tees ce} LOUCK_Lenproperday, Awwied Reds OnrAe> > | Is farsly_cenvesie fev ercodversow of Anew s Le) Bnd ede Ae. | | nee Sek_coutk in peopedy dnamied Sp poimdnmends of tovmsed CH) Adh : | Poe 8 Gy se eo Sequegenly denied ghaiki G's Melson. Gov 5 Ua a : | droves ons (2) sAlnexere We. Aish SON Cevty ee ee | <> anes 3260: 0f Seeks FARA Soare [diameter toy Ae erie | | REN SOR Caovek \ Dy. de ne Carey Ano Thi ach or | ero dene were Leow weer dt QuEpUstS, Does Lk ore clude Qeeddtem soe” S Eaehsy weer or occecu beers Aherk woes Lmproperty seus ed. pur soar | o WWD, Dike GS 2OBLA) tak mwrdees comely uabion of vx laber _ leases Oxelwe sb. Swoeweey E> 1S. wh WA So S$. ch. WEA. | ! | = . Me Oeithnone io Ahrens. B. Syreves TS me pr isomer orbs, <A | ELEN Tne thor heuer CWuek of OoXses ' DekecNou, NS O..cMourcd 6 * | SS —— __ | Rue sion Presented eg, | . | enenve Sar bra iw We B i ovEliclS usb Deesshous oF Omer Caveks eg LKB . . —~ | 2. Smpockawee of see Geese Presenked aa le c\oSo. ma. A2S iz | Decision of she Cour of Gooem\S of stn, Shombe of brews Bhenicn (9) Qirder of swe Supreme Courk of eee Shale of whew Meyice S)! |ousseon Sor-sieis chen neav-\e-se 0h. msde OF apps S . | | Po | Tas ke) SITS pe i l. mone Wess\ =A Car Time. a Meaoicwss,b32 Se. 22. 1,25 b _— . | pene ua bros wer ATK Cad, Oh SY B.ZOV (saa) = pa z . ois _ste McK imhes Cousin Bh, of Comms IAAL MAAC (30 A bn | les wh mee qj 69 o | La 5 5 Lee MA. 3 LGN = 94 ilo | gen state ig canscouns 22 ago ban aad} pg | Nar sted <5 © x as ok KAO $3 = | © (19,9 oa. ike palate Sc s = e a a 205\" oo. N | adele WA. of ornate . Rte o% ~ PAE Vs — OBE aa pitti. DS fe Ti a tea = p< 2 Sr oes Bar dew Log Shoe WX, ES 222 Br — pc 1% . ; . eee oes Me OOSATS. NR = Ph IVY = CAB ADU AU OM DAL TA AGF Me a | S| a oe da Qacorater Oo? — NroCr & 23 I Se | nome pris. Semeris bth So, 2). OF (DA. Cd Gat. Baa. IS89)_— oe, a | | fo. Ford. Sh a lL. . Mose o J Ae oo 2 | . [ as 2 A ape KAO AV. “Abo? % Cs | ssesle « Covestent oF Sondre rscrae VOGT ~ OUR AB pea, 3 | . i er SAS US 22. = 29,12 | i [eects ems The 5S oye of +ne Cours of Begen > ok AW = of Whe. Lore Lee de wireeorred.O copu is atbmcied oh AegesAay t ae Anis pedi on The erser of twe Supreme (evrk of Aine Shake of re | tierce. & cop, ie okkmche® os Opgerdsy B te s+his_pxkitic | — | | 2 idavemnerk of dine Couck of Bopeads of Awe Siete ‘ek phew Erbe ooo wer © Kc ns NH 202-6 6 Doss ocdsvy Pw eeers . [ 2.©20 aw ® a. cop cited RS esdeen Ps Deg pete Zo. dow | 38 gedsiiow. SuvishicKos 35 covbarced by 26 9.8.6, 9 125% and : ae JS. & . $ 2NG | This rt. woes One ere + co ¢ wet Seokes, Carostey Ere ° we — Aes * | _ Od GNA \o Oe Pc! we Sts mh coapaeek oer ot Wer.siS ‘ws Emone Amt ke aS om a pL sties hence or wdtiorxwwewk oF & aeeuds | : | we Zak A eee 5 avd or Udiual Soctes, or 3 ame | | eine m2 Le wckued Sevusee iy dame of Wee oe publi Awaer' NS soos, me pecan te eg Gar sine same attgnce ta be nice pat_| : . ~weopeve: e& Vie ow Vi . Noe vos WN 6Lonpe\s 5 Pn reer: i ke Be Wore SS acos . pen SS Ov ck ued pS Ake | New oF Ox. ope aM D>: are & oF Waves wor Q aan | | | 7 ae ~t ‘ 5 oe Dome mk TEM Ao ans. tied Sion les Consiaiculions <. mw sd a ge tk ken Sucked chon sinerte® emt 6 cbs eS oF tne, Om ideer rakes . Deed oF Ae Sleoke, imeress wey reside, wie Sirpke shal waite wr ePore | | \ Sas. Vash EN rave AW ersileoes o> mmo Sef ei : iced s+ sho Shale, ‘ exy persons._.of VS Pp

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent City of Las Cruces, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Alree B. Sweat
Alree B. Sweat III — Petitioner
Alree B. Sweat III — Petitioner
City of Las Cruces, et al.
Mark Daniel StandridgeJarmie & Rogers, P.C., Respondent
Mark Daniel StandridgeJarmie & Rogers, P.C., Respondent