Derrick Michael Allen, Sr. v. North Carolina, et al.
Whether the petitioner retains the right to petition the government for redress of grievances and whether this is denied in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED THE OSobtrmeuTés) im THE Nome OF CASE No. YoadpPia-a DS iReny inwolves A Svbstonnal Qvestion RISING ONdee THe CousmiTution OF THe ONiTED STATES PuRSLONT TO N.C.G.8. FABo. Henice, THE Said Seder Diterry IwolvesS A SOBsTaNT AL Qoesr On) ARISING, onder The Hest Saud Foorreary Auexsduent oF The OniteD © STATES, Comstirotian), iD THar IT (Deprives Kishrs Secured TMereonber TO The PloiniFF BY DENYING PainnFFE “Fentiag Foe QSDIGAL Revie GS. THE Qvuestiand~s) FRespuTed IS: COVER — Periionag Retain Tire Richr TO PenTiow THE OVER Knuieutr Fok An RebRess OF CHRIeVANILEG) Ne On AFReeDeES THE EQual Pesrenmon OF Lows QuarentseD BO The Onsite STATES CONSTITO no ° | |