No. 20-7111

Carlos Lopez-Vanegas v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2021-02-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process evidence-presentation judicial-interpretation jurisdiction jury-trial state-court
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the 'Speedy Process' globally regarded as a 'Miracle Appeal' be properly adjudicated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED — 1) Should be pursued ‘dn Spped Process bobally rerarded bo a Mireel Aopeat lee ° Properlywongelent jee) ues \e Mess ar ackos cea Ways eeh ees peestated bo Drake Lourks Oi cers te Properly address He aller aurd Pacts Vackual Mnistoer : Shlorte Appeal Process 7) Wou can a disguised d Qrocess of |, Ak ised due Process torkrary ko the lasslibubions CQvaray duce ces af Lats bias Qesecked ups pb fuss fashion es re seca NORGE TAKA 88 8SSurte Wiles Yaad \ury $0 Whos Serve fo decide as husuer at Las: \nnivendl, Golly as Charged : va) Cas a quiet ores r Salt £ oy . \ Cea ( fe We eyeewlion of lad ne silt oe etn tlie nal Neaseaases al esse Requesked Aasuer; \ \U \hat \G \ t veisdicki do We u \ rakes s Vither Adal wristiclios We whiie Wes ath webesk nee Spbe ut uteri al

Docket Entries

2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2020-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2021)

Attorneys

Carlos Lopez-Vanegas
Carlos Lopez-Vanegas — Petitioner
Carlos Lopez-Vanegas — Petitioner