Whether the Court of Appeals erred, reversibly, in affirming the district court's decision—making a drug quantity determination, after the Remand—where the sentence, again, exceeded the authorized statutory maximum [for Apprendi purposes] which is the maximum authorized based solely on the jury's verdict alone?

Whether the Court of Appeals erred, reversibly, by affirming the lower court's factual finding, without a jury finding, regarding leadership or organizer role and imposing a sentence that exceeded the authorized statutory maximum for Apprendi purposes?

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court's drug-quantity determination that exceeded the statutory-maximum based solely on the jury's verdict