No. 20-7125
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: collateral-review criminal-procedure Fourteenth-Amendment non-unanimous-jury retroactivity Sixth-Amendment Teague-v-Lane
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Ramos v. Louisiana applies to cases on State collateral review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court's decision in Ramos v, Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020), applies to cases on State collateral review, where the State follows the retroactivity framework in Teague y, Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). Rashan #42204 1\Willlams Rashan ushabwrt.odt Rashan Wiliams v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden i.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-17
Reply of petitioner Rashan Williams filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-02
Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
2021-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 2, 2021.
2021-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 3, 2021 to June 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-02
Response Requested. (Due May 3, 2021)
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent