Whether the Illinois affidavit rule under 725 ILCS 5/122-2 is an adequate state procedural ground for dismissing post-conviction claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _. “Th Post Conviction Hearin Het + vides 4 threess Fi the ad wdiatien of a. Petition Foe prstolnvicke relief. abet Beers Te @: rh (201%); Feople v: Caulpngy, 1 £11.24 410, 4)¢ (1940),. Since. Foderal me Hlinsis Courts’ regularly Follow Lilimis affidavit rule under 5// 20-2 Pee Psider il est “pr Enly adequate prods for a tlaims_dismissal _ This United States Supreme Court « ee . lower courts ad te ou much is “opeotel ae se review ' Deter te inom the. 2 & cons [tation A claim. Ar] ernativel) Should This United Siries wh eading Cours jhe cenkident that these_questiong have already been answ. Spree Prpor de isions ~_adse in Cases Such as People ven Wn mere nite _ iS) Court should Simply exervise its Supervisor authori yl 2d ad 17 _ Cause tothe _cirouit ‘court For second Stage priecedngs” ~4ne. remand this Nate: the tote eflate Court ; 7 pepiare. learly relied on Cllhnois’ atFidavi agli ta Pa ag eo Se EATS,