Whether petitioner was afforded minimal due process protections as set forth in Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979) when prison officials deprived him of a parole eligibility hearing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER, CONSTITUTIONAL. SAFEGUARDS SET FoR TY Z ; GREENHOLTZ. V. INMATES OF NEBRASKA PENAL. CORRECT: ConqQPlLex , 442 US 10999) WERE SATISFIED WHEN PRISO OFFICIALS ARBITRARY LEPRIVED PETITIONER THE SPPORTUNTY 72 BE HEARD AT AN ELIGIBLE PAROLE HEARING 7 | : TITION ER, WAS AFFORSED MINIMAL. PR oe UE Ne phocess PROTEC TIONS AS SET FORTY Tal GREENMOLTZ V. LNMATES OF NEBRASKA PEN jsonf CoRRECTIONAL, Complex, YY U8. 1.0979) WHE Me Ty. COP NCIALS DEPRIVED Hin UF A PARLE SUTARIMTY HEARING? WHETHER PETITIONER Hab A LIBERTY INTEREST PROTECTED BY THE 147 AMENDMENT Ii Ant Et /G(BLE ARLE HEARING AS SET FORTH Int PARUE STATE PEMAL CObE SECTION 304/ ?