No. 20-7152
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea habitual-offender ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus
ERISA HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was deprived of effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Indiana Courts erred denying Petitioner was deprived of effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution . when counsel and the Court misadvised/misled him concerning this , conviction being used to support the criminal habitual offender in the future under J.C. 35-50-2-8 rendering Petitioner’s guilty plea illusory and thus not entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily and defense counsel’s ineffectiveness during sentencing? ii
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana to respond filed.
2020-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Brian Hook
Brian Hook — Petitioner
Indiana
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent