Whether the systematic circulation of a private loan statement among multiple agencies with a personal photo (a practice of prejudice) violates the 4th Amendment privacy rights, which influenced the investigation contrary to binding precedent

No question identified. : ; . sT 0 PARTIES AM parece aepeak in the caphionw pntne CvVeER Dad, & . : — : —™s / ee nee co a ee ee sn ener ae ne TR a ee Questions , : Lotroduction a Our Constituti one\ Freecoun “is being vinlatecd boy and _cace. As ao disabled veteran of +heUnited States Avmy , wounded in Comloat with a Traumatic Brain Leyucy CTRI, never wo Av ne maging shat ma y c ou chit ous | freedom would be violated after saccificina So much for our nation. , , “ The 13% ana IA Amend ext aves ug the Lreedows toc | v. £ lif. ibe ine. | CAacism Ve o_prosecctor state, ~ attended the Uni eu St 0 oth ZEA O hack T Q A co <d LA ; leaa : ith V Co atiow OANA VLA ASA living ‘Vavish" he truth is, after my mother's death . Matriculate . throuals LAN T Ugon graduating in lA, EL chose +0 serve pouc nation, Vile way Lather, by “joining the tUiteh States Ac mu in AAT. ~The RauA seu Cle ociainated 3 eV 2\K \tCe on La e assumphou< DAS eS OU aCla preti ling ana" in dicectk < ith binding Fi Civew $ precedent it : 1Tea a ate < are, ASON g e a gq ¢, . Cet Cie 2012) and od LD CeMe ou + i) ecedent whed State aucia__ 50, 504 C1445). i CAS€L DEE he LoWow' 4 estion a eestions Ts ikcyctemic vacdkm tte civenlateo private toane statement among _multigle agencies. with a personal photo Cpract of prejudice) in violation of 44% Amendment — Seivacy Rights, which iefluenced the investigation an contrary TH. the ury charge and 1s in direct wun United States v Richardson, 76 F. 3A A441, 50s. co __Csth Gir 2002) Oe oA Supceme Cot precedent, United. Stites v Gaudin, SIS US. 506, 509. 199s) 2 please see. Case No. IS~ USF —...__ Petition for. Pane| Re hearing onbebalf of Be heet eal Remseun Gel? tte have less than 12 jucars ducing telal 2 to _breale theougl the front. dear of my home without knoe lang nor anne unciug using .assaul tw 2apons. —_teaim., seize my only small handgun kept with wy. Concealed handgun license CWieginia), leek men —...0utside of my heme. obile cthey searched the etive. heme. Bor nae _webhicles, +rash Ceoutiuely), etc., seize a AY. Aa ST ERT database to mail cacially profiling letters to. clients causing defamation of character 2 sin declacation ot ineffective assistance of counsel, tordefense coumse|, working and in glare wit pcasecuhion, to. fail +o perform trial duties blaming it on a flulcolA sickness, Fail. to pcesent_ alist of defense witnesses Cie. independent. peo.) fai (+o SUP PCESS _._iWegallyseized items Cie. bank statements, private fail +e present... __ocumented evidence--signed by. prasecutor So witnesses Cie. TRS Form 8514 perjucy statement, Client agreements /atidavits of acknawledament /.. ae .._ responsibility, ete.) that would've causeh a. different _ outcome ond result 2? + te exceed the maximum..sentence of BS. years.. as. stated in. 7206 (5) stacking of additional charges, the enteapment of being setup for failure /_ antagonized , 0 disregard of mental health issues elated to my traumatic. locain idjur as & Aisabled Ne teran...in violaHon. of the. Elgon. “hae ndment. C please + __ See. doctow's notes) © Csee included United States. 0f America v Enyinnaya Udo) cto have convichions foc charges with no evidence _._ “defense counsel made a motion -bo dismiss clue to ne: evidence. at ctrial-endA), for a-false accusation of pocketing funds that were actually cetained by “the TRS..due to ecioe debts Cie. Count 25-24 Bevrteium Thomas, _ fartner 1% nour... Healthcare Secvices., LLC), an do not ageeac we Cie. Kiane..cThemas). fee ecosecutuc’s. witnesses who ageee thak the ax cetucn isnot false. a _ Cie. ose Robles), foc mn on -Cce Able. witnesses ___kecause they benefited Leom the staxcetucns. | without being audited ond to pay cestitution _te.cthe IRS foe nom-=-reviewed | unaudited cefunds| tax _ceturns cecewed by taxpayers Csee US v + to have. Whegal convictions of false tay less amounts (C see Case |1€1159) 5% Creuit _.Couct of Appeals decision)? + —Vielahon of the Eighth Amendment, an the 00 Investigation of tay return