No. 20-7157
David Smith-Garcia v. Paula Burke
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment bivens civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment medical-care medical-need prison-healthcare probation
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against a U.S. Probation officer present a valid Bivens claim in violation of Ziglar v. Abbasi?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Does an Gghthy Amendrnent elena for deli berate indifference. Yo a Serioos medical need QaGinsk | US. Probobion officer present O WD Bwens Conrer in Violawon of ilar v. Abbasi Z . QTE ib does presen a ned Bivens Conte IS a Criminal Sopecrvised Telease Statute. (1% VS-C, 3533) 6n Gadequate Clhernchve femedy to & Bivens money SomageS remedy 2 ide
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent Paula Burke to respond filed.
2020-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Paula Burke
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent