No. 20-7168
Loren Joel McReynolds v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review base-offense-level criminal-procedure firearms-offense reasonableness-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review ussg-2k2.1
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court's calculation of McReynolds' base offense level was erroneous?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether The Court’s Calculation Of McReynolds’ Base Offense Level Was Erroneous? IL. Whether The Court Erred In Denying A Reduction In The Offense Level Pursuant To USSG §2K2.1(b)(2)? Ill. Whether The Court’s Sentence Of 46-Months Imprisonment Was Unreasonable? 2
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Loren Joel McReynolds
Anders V. Rosenquist — Rosenquist & Associates, Petitioner
Anders V. Rosenquist — Rosenquist & Associates, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent