Question not identified

No question identified. : i. REQUEST AND PURPOSE OF THIS PETITION Abhijit Prasad (“Petitioner”, “Husband”) humbly requests the U.S. Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus asking California Supreme Court to review his case in which a decision could be had or give court of last resort disposition acceptable to the U.S. Supreme Court. Husband is “in custody” and is currently serving a three-year term of supervised release (see Case 3:18-cr-00368-CRB). Due to Pro Se nature of this filing, Husband respectfully requests that this Honorable Court provide a less stringent standard of review when examining Husband’s attempts at case citing, rules, procedures, and legal syntax. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Erickson v. Pardes, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). ii. EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT THE | EXERCISE OF THIS COURT’S DISCRETIONARY POWERS TO PREVENT MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE; . NO ADEQUATE RELIEF CAN BE OBTAINED IN ANY OTHER FORM OR FROM ANY COURT. In this case, Husband’s multiple requests (see