No. 20-7172
Dakota Manucy Constantin v. Florida
Tags: advisory-guidelines criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment uncharged-conduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Constantin denied due process when the sentencing court relied upon uncharged conduct in imposing a sentence in excess of that recommended by the advisory state sentencing guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED CONSTANTIN WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS WHEN THE SENTENCING COURT RELIED UPON UNCHARGED CONDUCT IN IMPOSING A SENTENCE IN EXCESS OF THAT RECOMMENDED BY THE ADVISORY STATE SENTENCING GUIDELINES. 1
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2021-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Dakota Constantin
William Mallory Kent — Kent & McFarland, Petitioner
William Mallory Kent — Kent & McFarland, Petitioner