Don Arthur Webster, Jr. v. United States District Court for the District of Alaska
Environmental Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Does racial bias disproportionately affect the federal courts' treatment of marginalized people of color, when addressing the international treaty aspect of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 in relation to the purely local criminal conduct of prostitution?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (nN Does RACIAL BAS DisPORPORTIONALLY AFFECT THE FEDERAL COURTS TREATIENT OF [UARGINALIZED PEOPLE OF COLOR, WHEM ADDRESSING THE [TERMATIOMAL TREAT ASPECT OF [BUS.C.8 1/59) tM RELATION FO THE FURELT Local. CRIMINAL Conducr OF PROSTITittIOnS F (2) ZS ZT A MATTER. OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE AND CONS7/TUTIONAL WOLATION WIHEN THE NINTH CIRC T PROCEDURALLY REFUSES 7oO ADDRESS All (338UES RAISED CONCERN ING 1803.0 §/59/ BECAUSE OF ITS WHERE T WATURE 7O DISPORPORTIOHATELY AFFECT AULD PACIALLY LDUSCRIPIUMAT EE AGAINST BLACK AER cans © @) £3 77 Akl /SSHE CF plav~onad. [1PORTANCE WIHERE ALL Chee Cotyeg CH APPEAUS PRYIL 72 APPLY THE RELEVAMT LAW CHANGE Fo Atl CASES [MONG THE FEDERAL CRiptINAL STATUTE THAT (3 PET OF A TREATY, IB USC 31EU 2 Does THOSE DEC/SION'S DEFRRT FROM THE EXPECTED AID USUAL COURSE OF FilbIC/Al. PROCEEDING \IWERE A LAK WAS UNSETTLED AT 7e/At. Bu BECAINE SETTLED ON DIRECT PEWIEW 2 (4) CAM THE EXECUTIVE BOANCHS POWER 70 SHALE TREATIES AND We l0bth ConGLESS's PoweR WWOER. Ag, tT. (in. COwST: ), REGULATE Wipes local Chirtlat Cotouer & Does Taz tack OF #ESTERINT ON THE TREAT ¥ POWER. CONFLICE \li7tt THE SBtn THell GEtA ConCESS(S Linn 76D REACH OF THE EXtUTIVE'S TRERTY POWER. £ i