Whether the sentencing court must enter a factual basis to support a consecutive sentence when a defendant has never pled guilty to such facts, depriving the defendant of due process and the right to confront such facts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED iN gever Fora THe Sentenitin® Couct Ta BEPaer Fao ric Cantucacenr Sewrences EAU cemenr cu 0.@-S. SiG i 4aB(3) Koes CooveanmenT Must entree Farrual Basis Cy Suppaax a Condecutwe SEnteNteS ANY Duce DeFendanv, Muse Plea Guctty To Suen Fave ye DEMTENUNG CoueT MAKES ESSENTIAL SO THE Cusco ment OEFane THE Con sed y vive: SENTENCE? MevbE Innposer 8 , ® _( senvuon oF law *2sencet> nh * * wey ] \e Fe expan? De. Q eQuined tn Greve an addcivwnal —thtee (2) \Eents Conoecurwve QeNTenite Far OTAVE Ceonre nF Veruearlac i| usching Crnidocr Tn Which Defendant Hae NEVER “Peal Gustry So Such Fattpal eos Duca the Cun, ©. Mule i Pronidlestu Wend ( Fee Ceca. Cunduer Faas: U%er a Nery Posre onwieTuN Relee Writinn COM 2. tule. 35" +n Den} _Sreie POST Cony ie tion Appeal. to Deny Fedecal Habeas Comps Appeal Dstt ciel): Are Nat Ouppaeier Buy Che “HANS REPS Record pF he Come ©. tus\e Ve phavidenry Wearing \ Conduey Mace bed FACTS AS USED Are. NOUFEicveny tvndente x <n PLOve —CHe elemenTo UF Vettulac eluding, 5 and Such NaTer al Tracts sn Adopuiie Wed He Defendanr Wes not Given SHE Con STITT nN AL PLLA oN Such Facts Lowea Courts used to Ouppaee ChE ( IN Detect we Hertte nite Dere encanr LS BMemtv Niece Suck PACTS Andigp ute_ ace. Tro ANOUFFIMENT <n Poove elemento oF Cecme Fae Wei carla eluduvg ; Deprived DeCencdlany af His CoN FeaNnTer Lon amel Sut CAL CAQWe Guarantee n en THE Sixth Amenpmeny ano yaolever DEFER pants . (3) Q, eS MTN Peedesred Due Proceoo anid eQual Protection nF law Rien an he Fouerveenth AMENDMENT “in THE Contention ay THe wre States: a> loutee Courts ane Qubsecinsg ORISENMENT Aasec iin A Neieecal Facio my ciopute. ABOUT an addcTional Velieulag. Eludwg __ Seime Zeal Core? Hab Made eoSentiAL tn hE ___DefEndewr’s Consecutwe Sentenve 5 iki ate ___ Not AuTHeaxze. Y Cru. P. Rirle \l_, Colo. R. STAT. {B= 1410 (3) t ama” DeFencdany” & Fédec ally Paotecied MiGHTO cmd Laws 35 An unlaweal 5 Ente nce “EN Wich Srinid Be Conceored ar ony sine Reenedlest 1 any Ptoceducal DEFAuT alleagcl S Pecavse CHE _ __ DeFerdant io “actually anuncent” nr Such Fane Canoe cut we SHenvence 5 vuolated. 6 He. Pentrple. oTandacd. un Dlakle’ vi Weavstin@ran , 542 ue 5. Ar 303 | “eFanueg =n i eomurany ee ae va) ae APPaende vee 530. u-9AT Yat ~ __ Purposes ae Che MARMUM Denice A Sudge may ——sinpose Orlely un The Hass ne me Faria QefLecied int He Tua ver deer ae adurtbed Dy whe Derendanr | emONagia iW OFLGQuVAL ) AS TH Defendant Ha Never. lead GMurkn Non Mave een CO d GuiSay oF He Maietial FAtts Fut Whih he Stale and Feden al __ Counts Have noed <x Tus Fy Consecrerive DenTenrte .) (uesyiun Predsented AWWOnee NC wg~THe tasal Cone ugect Suen, ACTS IN ‘det. Den Vina DOSTCANVCTLON Celie AG THE Fist time De FEN NT WAS Wiade._e Ale ev Such MareniAl Facts From lice NE POETS ANG __DeFendan’ Vad Nav Plead Gauskof Ta Such FACTS AS “in Depewe Him nf Due Puress Nore BeFuce He “atoteducAL Default ak Nat CEN Fesecel = __Peorecred cals Nolan CLAIMS 5) ex Ouch Fact Ted By MP. \\ Hencancg TRANS Oc: eTeaclany Celied Uonal Wien Acatred” POST LONVUOTION Morin > Nato wth Suiting “HE PhRedeRVAi Lon Srtden an Derendany When Ye Was THt Ut Lal Comes Tad! FEaled Wr Le. ° Fur. VRE ener ee tee cH Pheu Bete Pckeaite ae (enue Conduer Wick SemioFied He elements FoR “Ce Come oF veniculert Cadi; cond Fare cM e Fads Wy womla latem ude To innpode _onisemerive SexTented ~ ancl “te FACS Used To pen posi ~ Conviction mebueF 5 th THe except Lon tu FederaL SyerUrTE 2] .9-¢. 8 2254 CHOCO ceQuicemenT on SXHAUSTUIN HE Steve Comer Remerlies La@use nf —pleck 1) and Hao Depsaved DeFendant oF Hw Fed erally PtoTe ed Rurdnis AS evidente. entered Fac Factual Bane Ducisg Crom, ©. Rule WPnovider'te. Heacing Reguiced Canc sten Senrrence Ncocd WG, 0 ) Qe sro Vaesented Tare lew > IN Statue § 19 -1Yaa ls | | («) |