Whether the Petitioners' constitutional due process and equal protection rights were violated

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Drdste Contech Aparls depave Retttoneras tis Constinttond nes Xo cue proness nd Eh ProeRiON oF Rue aw, 05 Yor O. querer: Consgivany Dy VEUsHAG YO Oyort Mis SCF= Ye Dap Anse Powe Chewmsedd of MS W761. 82095 Compan cord Ren over an Madd suo_ Sean disrdesed is appeal Sor fatnum Yo asente od Dpspye Neotey Serra weve Pornares Lomndciee a tnd Sse cowastrak pidente Showing nar hos He 28 RGA WL eapnidy CAE Wands of pico asinids: Ye Courcak Aronerhs xrveut UAE CRED COMES TONG AD ALSMhIAL CH LOS Hc vapronnse % Mecpelhy chic were We YUL Donec VEOnENeTS SPO, 1.9, V.5.V. S285 CVANIS My AS CUBE YP OF CPARUIAlY MARUREG ANSON UNANNAS APA Wado preety Presdat houne San org, EAASH.AS Ox OOuch annie RLA Wane Pouce PesanHhoned ouPAeMyyy Coney ody, SUTINRS WR TOES ch Poktoner’s Laut Rests Hea Ae Donehnd Supporting GoNweRany BAe Roce he na cttiarhed Lae ANON Wad, Grahasect “ZAouny nga nae CRAB aca Poitier cia wree cov s/anndated Tite UO CHORAL O DP SAD DAC ay Pace Dimnction Choos Phe Sake San ONAL Sey Sear FFG ony Ne. 2