No. 20-7192
Phillip Vance Smith, II v. Josh Stein, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel retroactivity sixth-amendment teague-doctrine
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rule announced in Melony v. Louisiana, 138 U.S. 1500 (2018) applies retroactively to cases on collateral review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : . | Questton PRESENTED | | aopies redroackvely bo cases on Collateral reviews | | —— a PART TES To TWE PROCEEDING . | Phi ip Nance Smith Tt prose, ond Erik A. Books (head oe | oS tne North Caraling. Deparment _of Police Safehy) one pordies ee | otne_proceeding, To dare, Erik A, looks has been represended | Ly dosh Shein (ANoraty General) oak tne Noydn Cacshn Bo a | | | | , | | | je | : —_ | i |
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Josh Stein to respond filed.
2021-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Josh Stein
Jonathan Porter Babb — Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Jonathan Porter Babb — Attorney General's Office, Respondent