No. 20-7197
Roberto Elias Martinez v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court due-process maximum-term plain-error plea-bargaining plea-colloquy sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether plain error resulted from the district court erroneously advising the client during plea colloquy
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether plain error resulted from the district court erroneously advising the client during plea colloquy that the maximum term of imprisonment was 10 years when, in fact, the statutory maximum term of imprisonment was 20 years and the court imposed a 20-year sentence? ii
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Roberto Elias Martinez
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent