Whether a court violates the Sixth Amendment's jury-finding requirements by ordering forfeiture based on judge-found facts

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether, under Apprendi and its progeny, a court violates the Sixth Amendment’s jury-finding requirements by ordering forfeiture, over the defendant’s objection, based only on judge-found facts. 2. Whether in personam money judgments—which seize even untainted assets—are an end-run around the criminal forfeiture statute and inconsistent with this Court’s precedent in Honeycutt. i