Whether the Eighth Circuit decision improperly denied petitioner's claim of violation by failing to remand to give him the opportunity to plead anew?

Questions Presented | id He Eighth Cirewit decision improperly deny Febhoners Kile MCs | ——inlation by Pailog to remand 4 give Ribbon te epperhinby Pe plead anew ? , | , Does Rake it & 1 uneguivocally place an ablirnative duty or he ditch . Judge to personally roby the deteodact of He range ate available /egal | | orale according to BI 816 seconed attenckr? Did defense counsels failure to provide professional ‘ guiclance te Yebhaner regarding his statutory mavinun seqtence exposure pric @ pla violate fis — Sixth Anendent Sight to elltchre Counsel a Can a pully plea be voluctary Pa deheadant doesat posses Me Krunltage | or unduestandng of Se bw 10 (elation 0 He dreds, and Was URGES. Haat dey guootity w/t elements We ottense? List of Artes | , oO All parties qopear in He caption of the Case on tak Covey page .