Did the district court err by denying Mr. Gonzalez-Mendoza a mitigating-role-adjustment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY FINDING THAT MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A MITIGATING ROLE ADJUSTMENT PURSUANT TOU.S.S.G. §3B1.22 DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY CONSIDERING EXTRANEOUS FACTORS IN DENYING AN ADJUSTMENT FOR MITIGATING ROLE ? DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY COMPARING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA TO DEFENDANTS IN OTHER, UNRELATED CASES ? DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY DENYING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA A MITIGATING ROLE ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT PROPERLY CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN THE 2015 AMENDMENT TO § 3B1.2? DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY DENYING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA A REDUCTION FOR HIS ROLE IN THE OFFENSE UNDER U.S:S.G. §3B1.2 WHEN THERE WAS SUFFICIENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO WARRANT THIS REDUCTION? ii