Whether an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction resting on more than one possible predicate offense is unconstitutional where at least one predicate does not qualify as a crime of violence

question presented is whether an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction resting on more than one possible predicate offense is unconstitutional where at least one predicate does not qualify as a crime of violence. Il. Petitioners also ask this Court to address whether, to make federal armed bank robbery “fit” the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) crime-of-violence physical force clause definition, the Circuits interpret armed bank robbery too narrowly by requiring violent force as an element of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). i List of Proceedings United States Court of Appeals (9th Cir.): 1. United States v. Dent, No. 19-17370 (9th Cir. Oct. 2, 2020) (unpublished) (Order denying Petition for Rehearing), App. A. 2. United States v. Morales, No. 19-17369 (9th Cir. Oct. 2 2020) (unpublished) (Order denying Petition for Rehearing), App. B. 3. United States v. Dent, No. 19-17370 (9th Cir. May 15, 2020) (unpublished) (Order denying Certificate of Appealability), App. C. 4. United States v. Morales, No. 19-17369 (9th Cir. May 15, 2020) (unpublished) (Order denying Certificate of Appealability), App. D. United States District Court (D. Nev.): 1. United States v. Dent, No. 2019 WL 4658356 (D. Nev. Sept. 23, 2019) (unpublished) (Order denying Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denying a Certificate of Appealability), App. E. 2. United States v. Morales, No. 2019 WL 4658354 (D. Nev. Sept. 23, 2019) (unpublished) (Order denying Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denying a Certificate of Appealability), App. F. 3. United States v. Morales and Dent, No. Dkt. Nos. 3, 47, 84, 86, 95, 136, 137 (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2009) (Joint Superseding Indictment, Plea Agreements, Plea Hearing Transcripts, Final Judgments), App. G-M. ii