Whether petitioner's argument under United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), deserves closer scrutiny

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED = eee WHETHER PETITIONER'S ARGUMENT UNDER UNITED STATES v. ee es DAVIS, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), DESERVES CLOSER SCRUTINY, WHERE 9 jon 5, APPLYING THE SAME STANDARDS IN DAVIS, PROVES THAT BANK ROBBERY =| i? 7.61). UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) IS NOT A "CRIME OF VIOLENCE" FOR ABS PURPOSES OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO TAKING. © 08 #iheh Er : “MONEY FROM A BANK BY "FORCE AND VIOLENCE, OR BY INTIMIDATION," ceeriand THE OFFENSE CAN [A]LSO BE COMMITTED BY THE MEANS OF ENTERING Seat A BANK "WITH INTENT TO COMMIT IN SUCH BANK... ANY FELONY oe gee AFFECTING SUCH BANK... OR ANY LARCENY.". mer es ae . OAC Numi en. {kx All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ry a [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of » a ae as . all