No. 20-7234
Kerrin Barrett v. PAE Government Services, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: community-caretaking emergency-doctrine exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment probable-cause search-and-seizure warrantless-seizure warrantless-seizures
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the temporal scope of the emergency doctrine governing warrantless seizures for 'community caretaking' extends beyond the immediate circumstances presented to police?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED J. Whether the temporal scope of the emergency doctrine governing warrantless seizures for “community caretaking” extends beyond the immediate circumstances presented to police?
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-28
Petitioner complied with order of April 19, 2021.
2021-04-19
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 10, 2021, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
2021-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-24
Waiver of right of respondents Areyal Hall, Joshua Luzier and Brian Galway to respond filed.
2021-03-24
Waiver of right of respondents PAE Government Services, Inc., Shanedria Wilborn, Sean Homer, and William K. Lietzau to respond filed.
2021-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Areyal Hall, Joshua Luzier and Brian Galway
Ara L. Tramblian — Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C., Respondent
Ara L. Tramblian — Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C., Respondent
PAE Government Services, Inc., Shanedria Wilborn, Sean Homer, and William K. Lietzau
David E. Nagle — Jackson Lewis PC, Respondent
David E. Nagle — Jackson Lewis PC, Respondent