No. 20-7246
Renaldo Demarquis Metcalf v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender criminal-history judicial-doctrine legal-departure sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines sentencing-process
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the use of the 'de facto career offender' doctrine distort the sentencing process and lead to unwarranted sentencing disparity?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Does the use of the “de facto career offender” doctrine distort the sentencing . process and lead to unwarranted sentencing disparity? i
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Renaldo Demarquis Metcalf
John A. Duberstein — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
John A. Duberstein — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent