Whether the State of Illinois Appellate Court ruling denying petitioner's claim

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1). Whether the State of Illinois Appellate Court ruling denying petitioner’s claim, where his murder conviction must be reversed, where his conviction was based on unreliable identification testimony of three State’s witnesses, where there was no physical or scientific evidence : : connecting petitioner to the murder these ruling were in error and denied petitioner’s due process . under the 14 Amendment? : ; i .. . 2). Whether the State of Illinois Appellate Court ruling denying petitioner’s claim that the trial ; court violated petitioner’s right to counsel and right to a fair trial, where the trial.court frequently “and argumentatively interrupted defense counsel and assumed the role of prosecutor through its: sua sponte objections during defense counsel’s closing argument, violating his 6" and 14" Amendment rights — to effective assistance of counsel at trial and due process? : 3). Whether the State of Illinois Appellate Court ruling denying petitioner’s 14°" Amendment : right when the trial court abused its discretion and prejudiced the petitioner by denying the : defense counsel’s request for a continuance to obtain the testimony of Martell Laura, which the defense worked diligently to secure and would have corroborated a possible defense theory that . Marley Collins was shot in retaliation by a rival gang member and not by the petitioner, violating | his due process under the 14" Amendment? » 4). Whether the State of Illinois Appellate Court ruling denying petitioner’s 14" Amendment due : “process right when the trial court prohibited the defense from publishing two photographs of Marley Collins; one holding a gun to his own head and another picture with a gun in his lap; . where such photos would have supported a possible defense theory that Collins was shot in : retaliation by a rival gang member, not the petitioner? , 5). Whether the Illinois State Court should order a correction of the mittimus to reflect only one . conviction and sentence? : oO BL EOF CONTENTS -> Oo OPINIONS BELOW vrs po RISDICTION ran ssninnninnininis innit... i CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED cemntns : _