Eunice Husband v. United States
DueProcess
Whether the district court and appellate court erred in their handling of the defendant's claims of plain error, judicial bias, ineffective assistance of counsel, and improper calculation of supervised release term
No question identified. : nn | $ Queshons Resented te fevtew —_ OO Xn accerdance with Rile \4 The Loust tomesbted Federal ule of Qeimemal Pract — 52 (b) Plain Error . FE Bias amd Nbandonment of Judicial role by Vishich Judge THX. Appellate Court Soiled to address dy stack Court's inQourt ~identif? cation po we Atellabe Court incorrectly asserts thet delindant Was Appointed Counsel fir Casens. \9-er-300\L v. Appell & Couch erred tn ofeming Nebiek Courts Caleclolion of defendant's new term ob Surerlised release, WL Ynellecdive Assishnee oh Veanseh Eth Rule 4 ay, Ligh of Sarbies tothe [rote ding, () Eunice Husbnd Rays oN 5 ( 2) United Shotes of hmeten, Re spondent(3) United States Di shriet Pout dor The Central Distriat of Tlinois, Springheld Viviston, Case Numbers 48-er30050 ond 19-er-300! (4) United Stotes Dourt of Nppeals forthe Seventh Mrosit Case Numbers 19-3247 ond 19-3248 | “Table of Contests TH accordance Ww wh rule. \Yéec) othe Supreme Rourt of The Late. Sate: — Pagecs\ Ramirez v. Cooke, Civ, No. WY-evDOVT-RBTC&S, (WS.Vis, CoD. Colorado) “ose? Mics. Martins. Loe v. Sulliven 5 2le U9. Hd, 5% (1999)... 2 U.S. fagan-Rodriqez, LOO F.3d 39, (Vet Vie. 21D). 0. 2-3 Loew Sales Xnce. vy, State of NewYork, NN WS. 359, LO L.Ed. 2d 420,99 SOk 2319 0.2 = Coolidge v. New Hemeshire, Spray HOS WS. ok HH4 4 Soh, ot 202%, (IQ) eo. 5 DPR v. Gursel Dealhad knoe, (200u) NSWSC WEE... Ks Williams v.Fenneivariay au 8.0, 189419055185 L.Ed.24 132, (2000) 2 oo. _ US. ve Wallace 557 Fed. Nope. 51, (Ta Me Zon)... 16 US vifolmer HLF, Supp-24 551, (ED. \g, Zbl... \h US. ve Johnson 5 "lip F.4 184, (Gm Bio, ZoI)oe 1o-\ -—U.S.1 Moslovaes 719-34 1st (he ie 201) 22 OW TO az, | WS. ve Tordony 15 F-34785. (Hh ie. Zoi)... \\ Poses) US. v. Lorrear Torres 32lo F.2d 18, (lot Me 2003)-e+ W Shabutes Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 32.1, Revakina o Modifying Rabation or Supervised Release... = 2,358)4 10 EA Crim.?.52 (b) Plain Error... \ 1B NS.L.S 3554. Kmpositionet o Sentence .-0-8 | \8 US.C.8 3593. Lnelusion of aterm of Supervised Release otter Kmoerisonment..-+ £4 United States Lonstibubiand hmenbmerts BL Le \,Z,bo\7 bee ere\ Qi ewan > Ralesaebor Sadiciel -Csrdack and, Sudrerdl-Disasility ___ Mi