Whether the infant/minor's denial of their constitutional appeal be final from the District Court District of Maryland, Greenbelt division and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and thus this denial be given the authority to impound the property and funds for the creation of a trust, and attempt to deprive the infant/minor the right to the absolute enjoyment of the funds/property

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner request to ask this Court to review whether the infant/minor’s denial of their constitutional appeal be final from the District Court District of Maryland, Greenbelt division and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and thus this denial be given the authority to impound the property and funds for the creation of a trust, and attempt to deprive the infant/minor the right to the absolute enjoyment of the funds/property of one who has come forth now, and is appearing at the age of majority: 1. Whether the district court erred in denying Petitioner's request to review Respondents bookkeeping entries (both receivables and payables) and the full accounting on the accounts receivables and accounts payables resulting from the deposit of TRUST/Estate of the ward/Beneficiary onto the courts accounts receivables and other general intangibles, a Constitutional violation? 2. Whether the circuit court and district court erred in denying Petitioner/infant, minor in exercising the 5th Amendment right to due process under the United States Constitution, which states "no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law”? 3. Whether the circuit court for Prince George’s County erred in granting Respondents the authority to file a false fictitious estate in the court record, and accept Respondents false claim as real which gave Respondents the ’ power to sell the trust and the trust property by using a false Bond that stated the trust/estate had a mortgage agreement with them; is this error a violation of the 5th Amendment takings clause under the United States Constitution that states “private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation"? 4. Whether the circuit court, district court, the Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit erred in denying Petitioner their entitlement to relief of damages in equity? (ii) 5. Whether the district court and Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit be given the authority to act in violation of administrative constitutional or statutory limitations on its powers? 6. Whether the circuit court for Prince George’s County, district court, and court of appeals erred in denying Petitioner to subpoena records from Respondents, (to compel testimony by a witness or production of evidence?) 7. Whether Respondents missed the deadline to file their claim under Maryland Code Estates and Trusts Title 8-Claims of Creditors Subtitle 1 General Section 8-103, by failing to file their claims against the decedent . with the Register of Wills for Prince George's County, Maryland within six (6) months from the date of the decedent's death in a timely manner? 8. Whether the circuit court erred in denying completing a full investigation of the false estate at issue before ratifying Respondents sale of the trust property/home; Respondent’s actions made the lower courts believe that Respondents had a Deed of Trust and Note with the false estate that should have been examined before the unlawful sale? 9. Whether the appointed trustee took an oath to uphold the United States Constitution before the Bankruptcy court appointed the contracted trustee over Petitioner’s Bankruptcy chapter 7 case? (iii)