No. 20-7267
Kevin L. Martin v. Cathleen Capron, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in finding that the claimed invention meets the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED G-> whether the ccurt of Areca ae oF eevee t clmed LI L pagh bar viele ter meets beve fennVe jee yareaf deg | with
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Cathleen Capron, et al. to respond filed.
2020-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2021)
Attorneys
Cathleen Capron, et al.
Aaron Thomas Craft — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Martin
Kevin L. Martin — Petitioner