No. 20-7272

Tyslen J. Baker v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arrest-warrant civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a police officer violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by executing an arrest warrant consisting of bare bones allegations lacking in probable cause as well as a temporal connection to the alleged offense or information contained in the warrant

Question Presented (from Petition)

Question Presented Does a police officer violate a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by executing an arrest warrant consisting of bare bones allegations lacking in probable cause as well as a temporal connection to the alleged offense or information contained in the warrant. i

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Tyslen Baker
Michael Trent LeeMichael Trent Lee, Petitioner
Michael Trent LeeMichael Trent Lee, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent