Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision conflicts with clearly established law in Fareita v. California and conflicts with the decisions of other federal appellate courts on defining an unequivocal request to proceed in propria persona, and whether the decision violates petitioner's right to dispense with the assistance of counsel as guaranteed within the Sixth Amendment of the United States and Michigan Constitutions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION CONFLICTS WITH CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW IN FAREITA V. CALIFORNIA AND CONFLICTS WITH ‘THE DECISIONS OF OTHER FEDERAL APPELLATE COURTS ON DEFINING AN UNEQUIVOCAL REQUEST TO PROCEED IN PROPRIA PERSONA, AND WHETHER THE DECISION VIOLATES PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO DISPENSE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AS GUARANTEED WITHIN THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND MICHIGAN CONSTITUTIONS. .. li