No. 20-7294
James Peter Sabatino v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-circuit appeal appellate-procedure civil-rights communication-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process mootness statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-03-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's appeal as moot
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DISMISSING PETITIONER’S APPEAL AS MOOT, IN THAT THE DISTRICT COURT’S SUBSEQUENT RULING REAUTHORIZING APPELLANT TO COMMUNICATE WITH HIS LAWYERS, DID NOT MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT THE DISTRICT COURT HAD TERMINATED THE WRONGFUL CONDUCT OF NOT FOLLOWING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS OF 18 USC 3582 § (e).
Docket Entries
2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2021)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent