No. 20-7296
Tags: appellate-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion mandatory-minimum oral-argument reasoned-decision sentencing-guidelines standing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must Circuit Courts provide reasoned decisions to deny parties oral argument under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Must Circuit Courts provide reasoned decisions to deny parties oral argument under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2)? Il. Does a policy of mandatory prison time violate the individualized sentencing mandate of this Court and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)? i
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-06-07
Rescheduled.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-10
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2021-04-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 10, 2021.
2021-04-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 9, 2021 to May 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-19
Response Requested. (Due April 19, 2021)
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Dane Schrank
Michael John Benza — Law Office of Michael J. Benza, Inc, Petitioner
Michael John Benza — Law Office of Michael J. Benza, Inc, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent