Whether U.S. military personnel can rely on U.S. court jurisdiction for harms by foreign corporations on foreign soil

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: Whether United States Military personnel, while deployed on U.S. Naval vessels undertaking a U.S. diplomatic humanitarian assistance mission, can rightfully rely on jurisdiction in a United States court when incurring harms by a private, foreign corporation for conduct occurring on foreign soil; Whether a Statement of Interest from the United States should be afforded dispositive weight when considering dismissal on international comity grounds where Petitioners are U.S. Military Personnel harmed by a private Japanese corporation while onboard U.S. Naval vessels deployed on a U.S. initiated diplomatic and humanitarian relief mission to Japan; Whether the lower courts had erroneously ascribed dispositive weight to their choice-of-law findings when analyzing and_ ultimately dismissing Petitioners’ claims on the basis of international comity.