No. 20-7306
Agustin Madrid, aka Augustin Madrid v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure case-preservation circuit-split criminal-procedure holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-interpretation legal-objection preservation-of-error procedural-unreasonableness sentencing sentencing-review standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Holguin-Hernandez v. United States is relevant to the objections necessary to preserve claims of procedural unreasonableness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S.Ct. 762 (2020), is relevant to the objections necessary to preserve claims of procedural unreasonableness? ii
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Agustin Madrid
Adam Ryan Nicholson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Adam Ryan Nicholson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent