No. 20-7323
Salvatore J. Moretti v. Borough of Paramus, New Jersey
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-history due-process judicial-misconduct military-control political-economics standing state-court-procedure surveillance takings veterans-exemption
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
issue-being-raised
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2020-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)