Was Petitioner unfairly denied redress for a malicious prosecution when the District Court of Oregon granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for a failure to meet the 'favorable termination' requirement?

questions presented are: : 1. Was Petitioner unfairly denied redress for a malicious ; oo prosecution when the District Court of Oregon ae granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for a failure to ; meet the “favorable termination’ requirement? ; 7 2. Was Defendant, Deputy District Attorney, John Gerhard, obligated to respond to Petitioner's lawfully served summons, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)? ; 3. Do anti-SLAPP laws offer First Amendment ; protections to Defendant Annalisa Ball for her filing Loo ___ of aknown false police report? | | \, Page ii .